Get used to thinking for yourself

Bernard Golden writes:

Fifth, open source. This doesn’t mean occasionally considering it. And it definitely doesn’t mean evaluating it by the standards of how you’ve done things with proprietary software … People criticize open source because it doesn’t “deliver business value.” What they typically mean is that they’re used to letting the vendor do their job of deciding what their infrastructure should look like, then providing them a roadmap of their infrastructure development plans, and then pre-integrating the solution with the vendor’s favored software partners. So, naturally, when you look at open source, it fails to do that. No open source vendor is going to do a dog-and-pony show and then build your proof-of-concept [for you] to get you committed to their solution. Instead of asserting that open source doesn’t deliver business value, run an experiment. Find out for yourself what the costs of doing open source are. And besides, as open source economics eats away at the margins of proprietary vendors … they’ll do less of the legwork for you. So get used to thinking for yourself.

I really like this. For all the FOSS cheerleading I do, I don’t normally get embroiled in proprietary vs open source debates, and I hadn’t really thought of the point that Bernard makes here: one of the biggest reasons that people will resist change is because there are many who want their answers handed to them on a silver platter.

AfC